Well done in short time - tnx. Still missing the raw scores for the
WPX-RTTY. Would be nice to know.
73s Uwe DL3BQA/DM0Y
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] Im Auftrag von
cq-contest-request@contesting.com
Gesendet: Montag, 3. April 2017 18:00
An: cq-contest@contesting.com
Betreff: CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 172, Issue 4
Send CQ-Contest mailing list submissions to
cq-contest@contesting.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cq-contest-request@contesting.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
cq-contest-owner@contesting.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of CQ-Contest digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted (Terry Zivney)
2. Re: mea culpa (Maarten van R)
3. AREG Develops new DX Pileup Defeating Technology (Bokverket)
4. Re: mea culpa (Mark)
5. New Super Check Partial files available (VER20170402)(02 APR
2017) (Stu Phillips)
6. Re: CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted (Trent Sampson)
7. Re: CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted (Ria Jairam)
8. Re: CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted (john@kk9a.com)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 15:46:38 +0000 (UTC)
From: Terry Zivney <n4tz@arrl.net>
To: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted
Message-ID: <590036630.2271257.1491147998109@mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
http://cqwpx.com/raw.htm?mode=ph
Please report any errors to the director@cqwpx.com so they can becorrected
during the log checking process.
Terry N4TZ,? CQ WPX Contest Director
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2017 16:32:00 +0000
From: Maarten van R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com, sawyered@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] mea culpa
Message-ID:
<CABTDq8hnv0X9nq_7giM2yGm3mp1PsWn7UmbZYQikmmWFHnn2xA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi Ed,
AFAIK this was about live score reporting, not about unassisted vs assisted.
Or perhaps I missed something?
Furthermore, I appreciate the unassisted category and wouldn't want to see
it disappear. I for one would love to see far more categories but that's a
whole different story all together.
73, Maarten PD2R
Op zo 2 apr. 2017 om 17:46 schreef Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net>
> Why is it that if something is "in the name of technology" its okay to
> force everyone to use it?
>
>
>
> Its far more speed, time, and calorie efficient to use a car than to walk.
> Would you be okay with someone saying you can no longer walk?
>
>
>
> SO Unassisted contesters harm no one.
>
>
>
> Eventually - we will be the only humans working robots. But at least
> we will be enjoying ourselves.
>
>
>
> 73
>
>
>
> Ed N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 18:37:26 +0200
From: "Bokverket" <info@bokverket.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] AREG Develops new DX Pileup Defeating Technology
Message-ID: <E4C991959D9E415E8DD6C83DF3530947@PC1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I must say that it was really an impressive bunch of advanced ham
communication techniques coming together in this remarkable development
effort. My heartfelt congrats, you people of almost the antipode from
Sweden! I especially admired your inclusion of the RBN while focusing on
SSB signals.
Just one was missing out: The earth geothermal vibration slow-mode effect
(EGVSME-73-88), which is especially useful for opening a clear virtual
tunnel through the earth from VK to Europe and vice versa (think of all
those Eu mults that you sorely need). Do bring that in, and keep the whole
ham community posted on all future developments!
Best,
Goran/SM0DRD
Stockholm, Sweden
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 20:20:06 +0200
From: Mark <pa5mw@home.nl>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] mea culpa
Message-ID: <ae63b648-28e9-656d-c856-5943aa28a924@home.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Very well put.
Thank you!
73
Mark PA5MW
On 1-4-2017 18:44, Ed Sawyer wrote:
> Why is it that if something is "in the name of technology" its okay to
> force everyone to use it?
>
>
>
> Its far more speed, time, and calorie efficient to use a car than to walk.
> Would you be okay with someone saying you can no longer walk?
>
>
>
> SO Unassisted contesters harm no one.
>
>
>
> Eventually - we will be the only humans working robots. But at least
> we will be enjoying ourselves.
>
>
>
> 73
>
>
>
> Ed N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 21:58:40 +0000
From: Stu Phillips <stu@k6tu.net>
To: "N1MMLoggerplus@yahoogroups.com" <N1MMLoggerplus@yahoogroups.com>,
"writelog@contesting.com" <writelog@contesting.com>,
"cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] New Super Check Partial files available
(VER20170402)(02 APR 2017)
Message-ID: <C1B3C0CE-36E2-4D41-9D51-A4FB62D759F3@k6tu.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
A New release of the Super Check Partial database files is available at:
http://www.supercheckpartial.com
Calls in the MASTER.DTA file: 45,638
If you would like to contribute your CABRILLO format logs for the SCP
database, please send them at any time.
The easiest thing to do is to bcc the following email address:
logs@supercheckpartial.com
...when you submit your log to the sponsor?s robot after each contest.
Please DO NOT send ADIF files!
You can send more than one log attachment in a single email BUT PLEASE DON?T
SEND THEM IN A ZIP file!
If you want to check the version of the SCP files you are using, look for a
call beginning with ?VER". Every SCP file includes the version number in
the list of calls in the format VERYYYYMMDD.
The next release of the database will be at the beginning of May, 2017. Any
requested changes or deletions of callsigns received by NOON PDT on May 1st,
2017 will be included in that release. Please send requests to:
logs@supercheckpartial.com.
PLEASE MAKE SURE TO SEND ADD/CHANGE MESSAGES WITHOUT ATTACHED LOGS OTHERWISE
I PROBABLY WON?T SEE YOUR REQUEST due to the email processing robot.
Please let me know if you find any bad calls in the files.
Thanks again to all the contributors!
Stu K6TU
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 02:08:54 +0000
From: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
To: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>, Terry Zivney
<objectiveuser@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted
Message-ID:
<DM2PR0401MB1119E2CD3668A3EF4153720BF2080@DM2PR0401MB1119.namprd04.prod.outl
ook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
There are some interesting scores there !!!
A Single op Single band topping the SOAB Score - when was the last time that
happened in a major contest?
Does the SOSB win SOAB?
Interesting
Trent
VK4TS
PO Box 275
Mooloolaba 4557
0408497550
________________________________
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of Terry
Zivney <n4tz@arrl.net>
Sent: 03 April 2017 01:46
To: CQ-Contest Reflector
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted
http://cqwpx.com/raw.htm?mode=ph
CQ World Wide WPX Contest - Raw Scores Before
Checking<http://cqwpx.com/raw.htm?mode=ph>
cqwpx.com
Raw Scores Before Checking SSB scores not available.
Please report any errors to the director@cqwpx.com so they can becorrected
during the log checking process.
Terry N4TZ, CQ WPX Contest Director
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
CQ-Contest Info Page - Contesting.com Ham Radio Mailing
Lists<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
lists.contesting.com
CQ-Contest@CONTESTING.COM is an electronic mail reflector dedicated to hams
interested in all types of amateur radio contesting. This is a good place
for contest ...
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 22:19:22 -0400
From: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
To: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Cc: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>, Terry Zivney
<objectiveuser@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted
Message-ID:
<CAMCyBs7hN5eHN20itmgVEHZ+HUy2gxrVndULo0vvKQNSa+8-+g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
The single band doesn't win.
In fact, I don't even think low power scores will beat high power even if
they are in the same operator category.
Ria, N2RJ
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com> wrote:
> There are some interesting scores there !!!
>
>
> A Single op Single band topping the SOAB Score - when was the last
> time that happened in a major contest?
>
>
> Does the SOSB win SOAB?
>
>
> Interesting
>
>
>
> Trent
> VK4TS
> PO Box 275
> Mooloolaba 4557
> 0408497550
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com> on behalf of
> Terry Zivney <n4tz@arrl.net>
> Sent: 03 April 2017 01:46
> To: CQ-Contest Reflector
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted
>
> http://cqwpx.com/raw.htm?mode=ph
> CQ World Wide WPX Contest - Raw Scores Before Checking<
> http://cqwpx.com/raw.htm?mode=ph> cqwpx.com Raw Scores Before Checking
> SSB scores not available.
>
>
>
>
>
> Please report any errors to the director@cqwpx.com so they can
> becorrected during the log checking process.
> Terry N4TZ, CQ WPX Contest Director
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> CQ-Contest Info Page - Contesting.com Ham Radio Mailing Lists<
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
> lists.contesting.com
> CQ-Contest@CONTESTING.COM is an electronic mail reflector dedicated to
> hams interested in all types of amateur radio contesting. This is a
> good place for contest ...
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:27:19 -0400
From: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted
Message-ID: <ccc1990ab918e31190d5ab48b2f5a5f5.squirrel@www11.qth.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Why? ABHP does not require that you run more than 100 watts or that you
operate on all bands.
John KK9A
To: Trent Sampson <vk4ts@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX SSB Raw Scores posted
From: Ria Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 22:19:22 -0400
The single band doesn't win.
In fact, I don't even think low power scores will beat high power even if
they are in the same operator category.
Ria, N2RJ
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
------------------------------
End of CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 172, Issue 4
******************************************
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|