CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] QSY

To: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QSY
From: Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 06:54:31 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Selective reading. There were quite a few votes in favor of innovation and 
encouraging bettering operators' skills. The survey indicated that there is 
reasonable support as well.

Rudy N2WQ

Sent using a tiny keyboard.  Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate 
autocorrect.


> On Mar 19, 2017, at 5:24 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com> wrote:
> 
> We have had many arguments for disallowing the practice.  The only pro I saw 
> was one of the technical merits of doing such and we should not thwart 
> advances in technology, which I agree but not at the expense of our already 
> limited bands.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>