To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC |
From: | "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | sawyered@earthlink.net |
Date: | Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:46:31 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
For the record, I often SO2R on the same band. However I am not dual CQing on the same band. So - I am not "using more bandwidth" on the same band. I agree with KK9A that if 2 or more bands are wide open, dual CQing on 2 bands is no different use of space than dual CQing on one band. But in the bottom half of the sunspot cycle, there is a difference because for good chunks of time, there might be only one optimum band for a circuit (ie - NA to EU). I think ARRL should make it against the rules like CQ has. Ed N1UR _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] what is required of recevied audio, and whay, Mark |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC, Jim Stahl via CQ-Contest |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC, Ed Sawyer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC, brian coyne via CQ-Contest |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |