To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Ethernet Cable Length |
From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
Date: | Fri, 7 Oct 2016 23:05:08 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Fri,10/7/2016 7:22 PM, Mike Smith VE9AA wrote: I am not a N+ (Network) guy, so I wouldn't really want to make an educated statement and any advice I would give would only be a guess. I know often I hear they don’t like running network cables like Cat5E or Cat6 more than 100m (321'). The issue with cable length is timing. I'm not the expert, but we ran into this 20+ years ago using Ethernet to carry audio in large pro systems. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Multiband Antenna separation forMultiplierstation..., Douglas Ruz / CO8DM |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power, Bob Henderson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Multiband Antenna separation forMultiplierstation..., Douglas Ruz / CO8DM |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Ethernet Cable Length, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |