CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power

To: Igor Sokolov <ua9cdc@gmail.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC Entry Reclassified to High Power
From: Martin LU5DX <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 12:55:15 -0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I think regional events should be held prior to each WRTC.

Say two qualifying events. Everyone who wish to qualify would spend their own money to attend.
These regional events could be organized and monitored by several local 
radio clubs.
To me, that's the only way to get rid of all possible ways of cheating / 
avoiding the competition out there.
Given the fact that these events are just qualifying runs, teams would 
use a simple and cheap wire antenna and simple rules (1 multiband 
dipole, one rig).
There are certainly solutions if there is a will to change the current 
situation. However I don't see much interest in fixing this fiasco.
73,

Martin LU5DX



El 05/10/2016 a las 10:51 a.m., Igor Sokolov escribió:
I am not going to be on any side of the argument. But we all know that power cheating exists and proliferates. It has become especially acute after the introduction of the new WRTC selection rules which allowed LP category compete against HP for the slot in WRTC.
IMHO RDXC should be commended for pioneering the battle against power 
violations even though their attempt is not fully approved by some.
RDXC can be criticized for their approach but can critics offer other 
reliable methods of fishing out power violators. I do not think that a 
100% reliable method exists.
Does it mean that contest community should not pay attention to power 
violations? I do not think so. Otherwise, why have different power 
categories in the rules when these rules cannot be enforced.
The simple solution would be to drop separation by power and have all 
the participants compete in one power category.  But would such a 
radical step be to the benefit of the contest community? Would it 
increase participation? I think not.
Then why don't we as a community use this precedent and try to find a 
solution? Let's work out methods of verification of power cheating 
that would be acceptable by a majority of the participants. This will 
be to the benefit of all the contest sponsors where  power categories 
exist.
Disclaimer: I have no relation to RDXC committee and not competing for 
slot in WRTC. I just like the art contesting and want make better.
73, Igor UA9CDC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>