FWIW, I'm with Ward on this one, gang.I don't believe anyone would argue that
we DON'T have problems with the wide-mode users accidentally (or not so
accidentally) stepping on the narrow-mode users (be those wide modes PACTOR or
WinLin, or those narrow modes PSK, WSJT, or CW).
We do.
But IMHO, we are in the short AND long term better off solving those issues
OURSELVES, through training, band plans, and peer pressure -- rather than
having the FCC or another government agency regulate or mandate the solutions.
Why? Because the mandates may end up causing other unanticipated problems or
consequences, ones that can take us years or even decades to get the agency(s)
to resolve.
Solving the issue by regulation should be a last resort. I don't think we're
there yet.
73, ron w3wn
On 08/24/16, Ward Silver wrote:
And if you have not had a CW QSO ruined by a RTTY station opening up on
your channel, you have not spent much time running CW. As I said in
2005, most problems have behavior as their root, not bandwidth.
73, Ward N0AX
On 8/24/2016 8:09 AM, cq-contest-request@contesting.com wrote:
> If you have not had a QSO ruined by Pactor automatic data station or a
> caller, then you have not spent much time running RTTY.
>
> 73/jeff/ac0c
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
About Us | Store Locator | Support | Site Map | Send Fee
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|