CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] A US Petition to remove CW only subbands

To: "'Chuck Dietz'" <w5prchuck@gmail.com>, "'Radio K0HB'" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] A US Petition to remove CW only subbands
From: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 09:42:56 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
When I tune around mobile on 20 meters for CW during a weekday, there is seldom 
anything below 14.050.  On the weekends, it is a different ballgame.  Maybe it 
would be good for phone contests to allow contacts in the old phone bands only.

73, Keith NM5G

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Chuck 
Dietz
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2016 7:38 AM
To: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Cc: GC <greg@k9ig.com>; cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] A US Petition to remove CW only subbands

I think the CW only portions of the band were welcomed in the "Old Days" of AM 
phone. There were huge numbers of US stations on AM causing a huge cacophony of 
strong carriers and, if they were not limited to what was
called: "the US phone band," no one would have been able to work DX. Now this 
is not a factor and I am one to believe that our government should not limit us 
to lesser privileges than citizens of other countries have without good reason. 
However, since we are basically "no code" now, I would agree with the bottom 
100 KHz of each band being CW only so that SSB doesn't squeeze CW out of 
existence.

Chuck W5PR
Just a boy and his radio

and amp and stacked monobanders...

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:

> There are only 2 band segments which are exclusively CW. Neither is on HF.
>
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 22:22 GC <greg@k9ig.com> wrote:
>
> > I just saw this today.  This could make CW contests interesting in 
> > the
> US.
> > "Petition for Rule Making (RM-11769), filed on May 2. Arguing that 
> > retaining the current regime of “legacy” CW subbands has proven to 
> > be grossly inefficient, Whedbee (N0ECN)said he’d like to see the FCC 
> > delete all privilege restrictions that limit any part of the Amateur 
> > Radio spectrum to Morse code to the exclusion of other modes."
> > Missouri Radio Amateur Petitions FCC to Designate “Symbol Communication”
> > Subbands
> >
> >
> > |
> > |   |
> > Missouri Radio Amateur Petitions FCC to Designate “Symbol Communication”
> > Subbands
> >  The American Radio Relay League (ARRL) is the national association 
> > for amateur radio, connecting hams around the...  |  |
> >
> >   |
> >
> >
> >
> > GregK9IG
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>