CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP power - read the rules

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP power - read the rules
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:53:22 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Doug,

Nothing personal, but I, and others, are attempting to make those who don't care understand how folks that DO.

See comments interspersed.

On Mon,1/11/2016 5:03 PM, kr2q@optimum.net wrote:
Of course, I am the first to admit that I am not a die-hard NAQPer.

If you were, I suspect you might understand the issue. Perhaps even read the rules.

I (rarely) get on, and usually that is only to give out points and have some 
fun.

In most major contests, logs from guys who don't play by the rules are counted as "check logs." Read that as "DEMOTED to check logs." That means, please play be the rules. Those contest rules give the contest its character. And the RULES say NAQP is a 100W contest with no spotting assistance. Likewise, NA Sprint rules require that you QSY after each QSO where you called CQ, and QRO is permitted. Those rules gives NA Sprint its character.

Let me make a point. Some guys think CQWW and ARRL DX are a BFD. I don't -- but for me, and lot of other guys, NAQP and NA Sprint ARE a BFD.

Some guys don't take contesting seriously, then criticize those who do ON THE CONTESTING REFLECTOR! K0HB, are you listening? :) Shouldn't you be reading the contesting reflector to see what other CONTESTERS think?

Sure, all contesters, big gun and little pistols, depend on little pistols and casual operators to make things interesting -- that's the source of rate and fun, and I'm one who does my best to be welcoming to newbies and casual operators.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>