To: | "cq-contest@Contesting.com" <cq-contest@Contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Latency and Code Readers... |
From: | Lloyd Cabral <KH6LC@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Tue, 22 Dec 2015 18:25:43 +0000 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
While we're on the subject of latency, does anyone want to guess what percentage of "casual" CW ops are using code readers these days? We've always attributed the casual operator "delayed response" to code readers but perhaps we're mistaken. 73, Lloyd KH6LC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Latency, K5WA |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW popularity from EUR Perspective: data, Trent Sampson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC-blue] NS for December 25 2015 - 0230Z - DUPES OK, Thomas Hutton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Latency and Code Readers..., David Gilbert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |