CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory

from [Oliver Dröse] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory
From: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 23:26:22 +0100
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> 
Jorge,
> So V47T or CR3OO would change for SOAB HP ASSISTED to win the plaque and this is ok for you? 
Yes as it is perfectly compliant with the rules (... you may use ... not 
... you must use ... spotting assistance) thus nothing wrong with it. I 
would even applaud them for their clever decision as well as their great 
achievement (doing more with less).

73, Olli


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
















[More with this subject...]










<Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[Next in Thread>




















Previous by Date: 
[CQ-Contest]  Category hopping, Maarten van Rossum




Next by Date: 
Re: [CQ-Contest] High Rate Dual Radio CQing, Eric Gruff




Previous by Thread: 
Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory, Steve London




Next by Thread: 
Re: [CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory, Chuck Dietz




Indexes: 
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists]