This is exactly why we should all simply work whomever calls us. QSO B4
wastes just as much time as giving a report and moving on.
And it's a silly lost cause to try to manage busted packet spots via QSO
B4 anyway. Give your correct callsign a couple of times and the dupes
will fade quickly.
Dave AB7E
On 12/8/2015 4:31 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
That is unsportsmanlike conduct. Lets say we work early in the contest and
I log you incorrectly as VA2EA, Later I call VA2EW and you won't work me.
You get credit for the previous contact and I don't. It would have been
just as easy to give me a report the second time. QSO B4 is not one of my
macros.
John KK9A
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Is working the QSO B4 good on long term for us ?
From: VE2TZT <ve2tzt@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 20:27:56 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It is after that bad experience that I have decided to systematically
refuse the QSO's B4.
After all, if my callsign is busted in the other guy log, I do not lose
the points but he lose the points and if he answers ''NO'' when I send QSO
B4 then I will work him without discussion.
Interested by your opinion on that point.
Gilles VA2EW
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|