CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required?
From: "XV4Y (Yan)" <xv4y@nature-mekong.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 06:54:39 +0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi,

In my opinion it will go unspotted. Two reasons I see :
- Some SDR receivers (like my very cheap Softrock) have limited bandwidth and 
only listen to the CW part of the band
- There is setting that some might have turned on which tell to ignore spots 
outside the CW part of the band

73,
Yan.
---
Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
http://xv4y.radioclub.asia/
http://varc.radioclub.asia/

> Le 31 oct. 2015 à 01:55, cq-contest-request@contesting.com a écrit :
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:35:53 -0400
> From: Gerry Hull <gerry@yccc.org>
> To: Mike Smith VE9AA <ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca>
> Cc: CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required?
> Message-ID:
>       <CABPfG-7X7DfiPmtj3CGY-Y5uYmic5rzJ8-buZjwKyac_VyKeSw@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> It was me about the CW squawk.
> .
> I'm testing it with VE4EA... (My K3 front end got blown up by an in-band
> mistake at K6ND last weekend).
> Anyway, I made a 60 wpm wave file for "CQ VE4EA".  For that sequence, it is
> 1 second long.   I would suggest
> that it not squawk on every transmission, but every N transmissions or few
> mins.  One second is nothing.
> 
> If you want a "CQ VE9AA" wav file, I'll send you one.
> 
> I'll let people know the results when we are finished testing.
> 
> This is a WAV file test, sending in SSB mode. (SSB + CW tone) = CW.
> 
> It'll be interesting to see how RBN reacts.
> 
> 73, Gerry W1VE/VE1RM

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>