CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting in-debth

To: "V. Sidarau" <vs.lists@gmail.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting in-debth
From: "Roberto Rey" <cwdude@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:20:38 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
So those little round thingys on radios really turn around? Nooo.. the horror!

73 de Rob HK3CW
----- Original Message ----- From: "V. Sidarau" <vs.lists@gmail.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 1:55 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting in-debth


I like the self-spot idea for 2 reasons, but I am not sure which of them is
more attractive.

1. No need to learn code to take part in a CW contest. As everybody spots
himself, every spot is error-free. Click on the spot, call the spotter by
pushing an F-key with your call-sign and if a reply follows, there is a QSO.
A history file will pre-fill an exchange. Isn't it great?

2. 8000 participants is a normal number of participants in a major contest
nowadays. 8000 self-spots a time is already nice, but 8000 self-spots every 10 minutes along with 30 minutes spot life will clog bandmaps and make them
totally unusable within a few minutes. Let alone cluster nods fed-up to a
limit right at the start of the contest.
The useless dead-fed bandmap may force people to forget watching spots and
learn how to rotate a tuning dial... That's also not bad.

Now. When the topic started, I thought, it could be a tongue-in-chick
statement, but there is quite a discussion ongoing...

Gents, are you serious?

73,
Vlad VE3IAE

--




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>