CQ Magazine is utterly mismanaged. It has failed to recognize and embrace the
impact of the Internet and user created content. It is not a viable business,
with or without printed certificates, unless they change.
There are many changes they CAN make.
Rudy N2WQ
Sent using a tiny keyboard. Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate
autocorrect.
> On Aug 30, 2015, at 11:22 AM, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat,8/29/2015 5:15 PM, Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest wrote:
>> One thing that I genuinely don't understand is what exactly is CQ Magazine's
>> sponsorship? If they have a problem with mailing the certificates then
>> what's left?
>
> Simple. The magazine and newspaper business has been in trouble since the
> rise of the internet. CQ is on the edge financially. It's not what they WANT
> to do, it's what they CAN do.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|