Hi Ken,
That is a great idea : having a real and imaginary part to the score.
The real part would be used for ranking, the imaginary part for your own
satisfaction and the modulus just to keep this list active.
73,
Yan.
---
Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
http://xv4y.radioclub.asia/
http://varc.radioclub.asia/
> Le 28 mai 2015 à 23:00, cq-contest-request@contesting.com a écrit :
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 10:21:11 -0400
> From: Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> To: k8ut@charter.net, cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] DX Contest scoring schemes
> Message-ID: <85e64.1630931b.42987e57@aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> You should multiply the entire result by i, the square root of minus one,
> the basis for imaginary numbers. Seems appropriate for this whole
> discussion.
>
> 73,
> Ken, AB1J
>
>
> In a message dated 5/27/2015 23:15:20 GMT Standard Time, K8UT@charter.net
> writes:
>
> I think we should take the raw contest score and divide by the following
> formula:
>
> ( AHSL + DxSW + NuEl) / ( PoWt + SsAi * (2Pi * OpAg) )
>
> Where:
> AHSL = Antenna Height Above Sea Level ( in meters)
> DxSW = Distance to nearest body of salt water (in kilometers) exception:
> Utah residents
> SSAi = Sunspot A index at time of contact
> PoWt = Power output in watts
> NuEl = Number of antenna elements on this band
> OpAg = Operator's age in years
> Pi = Pi to 4 decimal places, 3.1416 (all good formulas need Pi in them
> somewhere)
>
> -larry (K8UT)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|