CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A

To: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A
From: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 07:38:43 +0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
​All this discussion is why I just work people and send a log, maybe.  I
can not see my score easily and do comparisons the way a normal person can
with PRINTED PAGES. 73, Charly

On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 6:12 AM, K4XS via CQ-Contest <
cq-contest@contesting.com> wrote:

> This has been an interesting thread and without doubt TO7A is one  hell of
> an op, with or without the use of spotting assistance.  The rates  are far
> better than I could do with assistance on CW.
>
> Is it cheating to be hooked to packet or telnet if you are just  posting
> spots or just receiving WWV reports....if you are SO unassisted?  I
> believe
> the answer is no for both.
>
> K4XS/KH7XS
>
>
> In a message dated 5/8/2015 9:43:21 P.M. Coordinated Universal Time,
> ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca writes:
>
> Was he  connected to a telnet or packet or RBN/Skimmer cluster somewhere?
>
> Surely sysops have logs of who was connected when. (perhaps with  an
> alternate callsign?)
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
Charly, HS0ZCW
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>