| To: | "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP | 
| From: | "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com> | 
| Date: | Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:33:48 -0500 | 
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> | 
I nade two serioud attempts at QRP operating.  In 1978 I ran the CQ WW SSB 
and did add/qrp and found that this caused far too much problem.  In 1984 I 
won the USA Plaque for QRP in the ARRL SSB.  My score would have placed 4th 
in low power.  I learned that using the voice keyer that just sending my 
call without /QRP was the way to go. With a good antenna and the right 
propagation QSOs were easy to make at times and impossible at other times. 
I found that if a station did not answer after 4 or 5 calls go on to another 
station or even change bands.  I even had a couple of runs of South 
Americans
and one short Eu runI expect that with computer logging that the /QRP causes all sorts of problems. I remember logging mobiles as /m but this showed up as England. My hat is off to the dedicated QRP Contesters. For me 100 watts is my QRP..Dave K4JRB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
 
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The "high and mighty" syndrome on display, Tom Osborne | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The "high and mighty" syndrome on display, Larry | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP, w7dra | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] QRP, Michael Clarson | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |