CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Clarification from DL1MGB

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Clarification from DL1MGB
From: Frank Grossmann <frank@grossmann.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 07:39:49 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Chris, 

you just made the best part of your previous planning obsolete in my eyes. You 
dared to do something new. Against the idea of a lot of other people who for 
whatever reason were trying to make sure Assisted will aways stay second in 
line.

Improvement and advancing technology has always been an important part in Ham 
Radio, as well as true sportsmanship for contests, especially in WRTC.

Sportsmanship implies that ideally all competitors are compared against one 
another - the comparison group SO HP is now divided by half allowing for 
strategic decisions on the competitors side that were not possible before.

And as for technological progress - now the most important factor in promoting 
that is to make sure people know how to use ReverseBeacon and Clusters without 
being detected. 

And don't tell me people don't do it. And don't tell me that current analysis 
software will detect that if a clever OP knows how to use it. 

And no, I am not saying everyone does. But some sure do.

73
Frank
DL2CC

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>