| To: | Cqtestk4xs@aol.com, cq-contest@contesting.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted? | 
| From: | Ktfrog007--- via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> | 
| Reply-to: | Ktfrog007@aol.com | 
| Date: | Fri, 12 Dec 2014 09:41:38 -0500 | 
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> | 
How widespread is this practice? Everyone talks about it but I've never heard any statistics. Given human nature, I assume the worst, too, but some real data would be better. Everyone talks about alien abductions, too. 73, Ken, AB1J In a message dated 12/12/2014 14:26:38 GMT Standard Time, cq-contest@contesting.com writes: If it wasn't an advantage, why would so many guys use it and then claim single op unassisted? K4XS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest  | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
  | ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted?, K4XS via CQ-Contest | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted?, K4XS via CQ-Contest | 
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted?, K4XS via CQ-Contest | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted?, K4XS via CQ-Contest | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |