I agree that M/S is such a misnomer for the current rules that is
actually a two station setup, but in my experience M/S without a mult
station is so boring (like in IARU HF). I love current M/S rules.
Just my 2 yen.
73 rin JG1VGX
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de> wrote:
>
> Why not an Overlay category for "true" M/S like there is for SO Classic?
> Might be a worthwhile idea without needing to change the rules themselves,
> impact on records, a.s.o.
>
> 73, Olli - DH8BQA
>
> Contest, DX & radio projects: http://www.dh8bqa.de
>
>
> Am 26.10.2014 03:29, schrieb Paul Stoetzer:
>
>> I do wish there were a category for multiple operators taking shifts
>> operating a single radio. I have no problem with the M/S category, but
>> it'd
>> be nice to have a "true" M/S category too.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Paul, N8HM
>>
>> On Friday, October 24, 2014, <k2qmf@juno.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Charlie K4VUD,
>>>
>>> DUMD is in the eyes of the beholder!
>>>
>>> Maybe us "second level pistols" enjoy operating M/S.
>>> I'm sorry that you don't see the enjoyment in contesting!
>>> See you on the WARC bands some day! Don't hold your breath...
>>>
>>> Swiss cheese, 73, Sal
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:57:52 +0700 Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com
>>> <javascript:;>>
>>> writes:
>>>>
>>>> Tnx KR2Q.... Now I remember why I thot the Multi One category is
>>>> dumb. I
>>>> see that it does give the second op something to do in addition to
>>>> sleep,
>>>> but really kills off the idea of ONE op and ONE radio to which the
>>>> category
>>>> NAME implies. The rule that I have finally paid attention to
>>>> appears to
>>>> be a cheap way for second level pistols to APPEAR to compete with
>>>> the first
>>>> level pistols. More and more as I reawaken to the contest rules I
>>>> understand why the whole things are designed by big pistol ops and
>>>> why many
>>>> other operators opt out of contesting. I also refer to rules which
>>>> make
>>>> huge Asia equal to EU.
>>>>
>>>> Baloney, 73, Charly
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:40 PM, <kr2q@optimum.net <javascript:;>>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Charly,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, you have read it correctly. It has been this way for over 3
>>>>
>>>> decades.
>>>>>
>>>>> See my article in CQ from August 1981, where M/S is elaborated.
>>>>> It was that way even before my article. This article is a bit
>>>>
>>>> dated, so
>>>>>
>>>>> for
>>>>> up to date information, see the 2 links below.
>>>>>
>>>>> See: http://www.cqww.com/rules.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> Also see the Multi-Single FAQ: http://www.cqww.com/rules_faq.htm
>>>>> Scroll about half way down the above cited page.
>>>>>
>>>>> GL!
>>>>>
>>>>> de Doug KR2Q
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Charly, HS0ZCW
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> Map Your Flood Risk
>>> Find Floodplan Maps, Facts, FAQs, Your Flood Risk Profile and More!
>>> http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/544a8a35684f3a352e09st04vuc
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com <javascript:;>
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
73 de rin JG1VGX
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|