CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Size of Dual Monitors

To: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Size of Dual Monitors
From: Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:16:39 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 Not to morph the monitor thread into a optic thread, they tend to go hand in 
hand !
I have been prescribed bifocals for the last 10 years.    B-4 that I was lucky 
to get away with over the counter  ?X reading  glasses from the the RX store.
That even worked in the beginning of the BIFOCAL adjustment period for RADIO 
/computer stuff.  But over time I lost the focus .
 I spoke to my OPTOMATRIST  also a fellow Ham and CONTESTER    ( and FRC club 
member )  and He whipped me up a set of Glasses that were optimized for the 32"
 distance to my average screen.  WOW  what a difference   no sore neck &  
shoulders from the up/down head movement ....well worth the $
 He has since retired and my last two optic changes.... have included a pair of 
 glasses, single focus @ the  30"   focal target .
 
Wayne W3EA   

 
> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 10:47:19 -0400
> From: n4zr@contesting.com
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Size of Dual Monitors
> 
> I found it necessary to try a couple of pairs of drugstore readers 
> before I found something that worked well. Why?  Because my monitors are 
> farther from my normal operating position than I would normally hold a 
> book.  The height point is an excellent one - you can feel the 
> difference very quickly.  Mine are *just* below straight ahead.
> 
> 73, Pete N4ZR
>                                         
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>