Then lets address those that have an issue. This seems like veiled
threats by those in charge. Instead of dealing directly with those who
do not sign "properly" we instead decide to write up more rules with the
threat of a DQ........... Threats don't sound like much fun to me......
Do people think they are entitled to work everyone they hear? Is your
time worth more than mine?
Do you think Nascar would slow down a race because people can't really
see who just whipped by on the track or the sponsors start complaining
that their logos are impossible to see at 200mph...........
Mike W0MU
On 2/3/2014 2:27 PM, Steve London wrote:
On 02/03/2014 01:49 PM, Ken Widelitz wrote:
who think it is discourteous not to ID after every
QSO:
You missed Bob's point entirely. The idea is to have callers in the
pileup
wait as short a time as possible to work you.
You have ignored the time wasted by those who are listening, and
silently waiting for you to sign your call. We don't want to add to
the mayhem when, on Sunday afternoon, there is a good chance you are a
dupe. We also don't appreciate you wasting our time for alleged
benefit of reducing the waiting time of those who are calling.
As to your own behavior, you are right - I never recall having to wait
long for you to ID. However, I can name others who have gone 10-15-20
QSO's without an ID in CQWW.
73,
Steve, N2IC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|