Re: [CQ-Contest] what else is lost

[Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>]

> Charly, why are you so quick todismiss the idea of a web-based,
> advertiser-supported magazine?  It requires more than QST's images of
> the paper magazine, but as someone suggested a few weeks ago, there
> *are* successful hobby magazines on the web.  Of course, some people
> will always seek out "echo chambers" that reinforce their own views, but
> quality still has a chance.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
Do these magazines actually make money from subscriptions or from the 
advertising revenue?  Maybe fewer vendors are advertising in CQ.  I know 
that QST is about half ad's now.  73
Tom W7WHY

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest