CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending Call getting worse?

To: "Cqtestk4xs@aol.com" <cqtestk4xs@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending Call getting worse?
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:45:30 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
If you guess, it's a busted Q = No points.  With crutches like 
Super-Check-Partial loose in the wild, who needs to guess anyhow?





73, de Hans, K0HB

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:54 PM, null <Cqtestk4xs@aol.com> wrote:

> Without some sort of penalty why not guess and/or make up  "uniques".  Only 
> the Qs that they don't like are the ones you lose.  I  don't know if the 
> prior or subsequent QSO should be lost, but there needs to be  some kind of 
> penalty for busted Qs.  No penalty is so 2000s.
>  
> For the serious guys it DOES matter.
>  
> Bill K4XS
>  
>  
> In a message dated 11/27/2013 5:01:28 P.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,  
> kzerohb@gmail.com writes:
> Joe, I  think you're taking this game a little too seriously.
> Screw up a QSO,  you lose that QSO, but punishment in the form of 
> additional 
> score  reduction is so 1940's.
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> --
> "Just a boy and his  radio"™
> --
>> I would like to see the QSO's before and  after also be  removed.
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest  mailing  list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest  
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing  list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>