CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] I need a cloudwarmer!

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] I need a cloudwarmer!
From: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:15:19 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hans, I feel in the same situation on the high bands at least. I can work
CA over and over again on 10M but what's the fun in that? On sweeps this
isn't a great loss because it's once per contest, but in a once per band
contest like NAQP I end up with decidedly few multipliers on 10M.

I built some low dipoles and vees, which according the models had more high
angle radiation. But in actual tests, I find they are uniformly down 6-10dB
no matter what the distance compared to my high wire.

I think the only solution to picking up more mults on the high bands is
more gain, but that comes with the cost of narrower beamwidth. I have heard
some of the top-notch midwest contest stations in domestic tests: They
either have multiple transmit antennas, or some kind of easily switchable
array, because I hear them cycling through directions on each CQ and then
when I call them they go "loud" in my direction. I do something similar but
receive-only with my K9AY loop in a 160 test, because I use foot-switches
to pick the direction, and the nulls are so deep that when I'm listening SE
that a loud New England station just isn't there, that I routinely cycle
direction after each CQ.

Tim N3QE.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>