Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotsh

To:	John Geiger <af5cc@fidmail.com>, Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy
From:	Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:21:07 -0400
List-post:	<cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

To:

John Geiger <af5cc@fidmail.com>, Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>

Subject:

Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy

From:

Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>

Date:

Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:21:07 -0400

List-post:

<cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

I could be wrong, but I don't believe that any current production radiocan receive while transmitting. N1MM Logger has an SO2V (single op 2VFOs) capability that mainly provides for automatic switching betweenlistening on one VFO or the other, but not listening on one whiletransmitting on the other.


73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

On 10/23/2013 1:12 PM, John Geiger wrote:

In terms of the "one radio" rule, what if someone in the classicoverlay is using the Yaesu FTDX9000D or MP models? That is one radio,but from what I understand, you can do what is essentially SO2R with it.

John AF5CC

On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com<mailto:kzerohb@gmail.com>> wrote:


    My understanding is that the "Classic" overlay was intended as "a
    Boy and his Radio" class.  Why would you want to screw with that?

    73, de Hans, K0HB

    -----Original Message----- From: Pete Smith N4ZR

    I would just add one point.  I've been told that the 1 radio no
    spotting
    caveats were added because some folks on the CQ Committee were
    concerned
    that non-assisted hot-shots would drop down to the 24-hour overlay
    unless these things were outlawed.  I frankly doubt this, particularly
    with respect to the assisted/non-assisted angle.  However, instead of
    sitting on the sidelines, it is important that supporters of the
    24-hour
    category enter it this year, so that we can credibly make the argument
    for loosening that restriction next time.


    _______________________________________________
    CQ-Contest mailing list
    CQ-Contest@contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
    http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
    _______________________________________________
    CQ-Contest mailing list
    CQ-Contest@contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
    http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules reminder, Randy Thompson K5ZD Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules reminder, Steve London [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Pete Smith N4ZR Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Rick Tavan N6XI Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Richard F DiDonna NN3W Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, David Gilbert Re: [CQ-Contest] 24-hour Overlay was: WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Pete Smith N4ZR Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, W0MU Mike Fatchett Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Radio K0HB Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, John Geiger Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Pete Smith N4ZR <= Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, John Geiger Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Joe Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, W0MU Mike Fatchett Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, John Geiger Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Mark Beckwith Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, Dale Putnam [CQ-Contest] Proponents of Backwardness, Radio K0HB Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, W0MU Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Reminder, Edward Sawyer Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Reminder, Pete Smith N4ZR

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, David Gilbert
Next by Date:	Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, John Geiger
Previous by Thread:	Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, John Geiger
Next by Thread:	Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, John Geiger
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Previous by Date:

Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, David Gilbert

Next by Date:

Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, John Geiger

Previous by Thread:

Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, John Geiger

Next by Thread:

Re: [CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy, John Geiger

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]