Yeah butt...
He was running "assisted"... using the cluster, a database, or worked
you on another band. He already knew your information and he didn't need
to waste time listening for it again. :-)
But then, he DID have time to waste by sending you QSO B4 several times
later.
Go figure!
73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 9/4/2013 11:29 AM, Jim Preston wrote:
Jukka,
That doesn't always work. In a recent contest, a running station
confirmed my exchange. However, I hadn't sent an exchange yet. He then
went on to work another station. Since I hadn't sent my exchange, we
didn't have a valid QSO. I called him back and got B4. I tried calling
him later and got B4. Since we didn't have a good QSO, he didn't get
in my log.
73,
Jim N6VH
On 9/4/2013 3:29 AM, Jukka Klemola wrote:
How come so many suggest stopping there, removing the QSO and then
tuning
for the next frequency?
I was expecting someone or anyone suggesting calling again the
station that
is on thr frequency and is not in your log.
Why go and try to find a next frequency as you already are on a
frequency
of a station that you do not have in your log?
Finalise the QSO ..
That will yield you more QSOs at the end of the contest.
It also produces a bigger score.
73,
Jukka OH6LI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|