I'd rather have it pass along the errors then the click and shoot folk
that don't COPY what is sent get the dings.
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 7/16/2013 12:53 PM, Barry wrote:
How would it filter out commonly miscopied calls such as LW3LPL and
JH3CTQ (the latter being human error)?
Barry W2UP
On 7/16/2013 10:41, Hal Kennedy wrote:
I may be by myself all alone out in the woods with this opinion, but
I like the RBN having errors. The "image problem" is probably
something worth filtering out to the degree technically possible, but
the rest? I like the errors.
As a usually-assisted operator, one of my discriminators, just as in
unassisted, is experience. I know A LOT of the calls by heart, I can
do "off-by-one" in my head. I know how strong particular stations
and stations in general should be at any given hour, and who has
clix, who goes slow and who goes fast, and I also know how RBN errors
tend to look in real-time and over time. This allows me to mentally
filter the errors out.
I'd like to continue to see operators have to actually copy the
callsign and exchange to be sure, and to keep their UBN under control
- which goes away with error-free data. I like the errors, they
benefit those who have put in the work and and are willing to copy it
all, when others can't or won't. I also think (or hope?) the errors
encourage others to pick up their game.
With the best of intentions....
73,
Hal
N4GG
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|