CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL fieldday reports at RBN (reversed beacon network)

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL fieldday reports at RBN (reversed beacon network)
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 18:08:32 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ulli I don´t agree.
The figures can not be compared as useful they are.
The main factor for signal to noise is the local noise picked up by the
different antennas connected to the skimmers and the qrm noise on the
frequency at the time of recording.

73
Peter


-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Ulli Grunow

After the contest you can check the signal to noise ratio the various
automatically operating CW skimmer receivers report. As everybody is using
identical software and many even using same hardware (the great QS1R
receiver by Phil Covington), the figures reported can be compared. 


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>