CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] R: Re: Remote

To: <w0mu@w0mu.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] R: Re: Remote
From: "fabio.grisafi@libero.it" <fabio.grisafi@libero.it>
Reply-to: "fabio.grisafi@libero.it" <fabio.grisafi@libero.it>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:15:44 +0200 (CEST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree with Mike!

It will be a good opportunity for many of us that are tripping all the time 
across Europe, or across a country, because of job and cannot be at home during 
a contest week end.

It will be a good opportunity, also, for retired people because they will take 
part in a club around a remote controlled station (and maybe they cannot go on 
the tower to repair antennas).

It will be a good opportunity for those that have not a backyard at home but 
that can build a station at the summer cottage where,
without this opportunity, they didn't realize to build a station QRV few 
months per year.

This is tecnology, you can't stop it. Amateur radio involves tecnology and 
this is the future ... or you prefere those guys that says that amateur radio 
is an obsolete "hobby" ????

73 and best regards,

Fabio - IT9GSF.


>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: w0mu@w0mu.com
>Data: 19/06/2013 18.03
>A: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>Ogg: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote
>
>So where your butt sits determines if it is ham radio?
>
>I really don't understand those that want to limit the participation in 
>contests.  Are we not better off with more people contesting than less?  
>I think so.  Running remote places most at a disadvantage.    What is it 
>about remote operation that scares you?
>
>What if I can't drive myself to the station because I am recovering from 
>an illness or a myriad of other reasons.  Under your rules I am out of 
>luck.
>
>Remote operating is going to open the world of HF and contesting to many 
>that have never had that option before.
>
>Repeaters is not Ham Radio and to think I thought I had heard it all.
>
>Mike W0MU
>
>On 6/19/2013 8:59 AM, PA5MW, Mark wrote:
>> Sorry Tom,
>>
>> But 'the opponents' are not amused by being accused of being jealous 
>> or anything like that.
>>
>>
>> Again, for the record; I very much respect all the work and effort 
>> done for enabling a remote HF station.
>> I understand what it serves, especially for those who during the week 
>> suffer from a small lot, hampered by noise, antena restrictions 
>> etc..etc.. I would do the same. But for the HF contest weekend: get 
>> your butt over there and put it in the seat.
>>
>> Funny(not) that *our* opponents have a hard time accepting that other 
>> people think different and share their opinion.
>>
>> 73 Mark, PA5MW
>>
>>
>> On 18-6-2013 21:10, N1MM wrote:
>>> The opponents don't want some well-heeled guy buying an oceanfront 
>>> lot, building a big contest station and beating the locals. People 
>>> don't like carpetbaggers.  That's about it.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Tom - N1MM
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] R: Re: Remote, fabio.grisafi@libero.it <=