Hi
as information only, how many times was implemented this procedure and what
were the results?
Only CC can determine what station will be visited or may I ask CC to
inspect X station?
73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W
-----Mensaje original-----
De: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] En nombre de
w5ov@w5ov.com
Enviado el: lunes, 03 de junio de 2013 11:35
Para: Juan Hidalgo EA8CAC
CC: k5zd@charter.net; Albert Crespo; Rex Maner; Martin Durham;
cq-contest@contesting.com
Asunto: Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview Draft of 2013 CQ WW Contest Rules
Tap the brakes, guys!
There is nothing about signing up or registering before the contest in the
rule! All commentary about this is complete conjecture!!
The issue is being willing to allow inspection - should someone official
show up at your door during the contest!
The likelihood is pretty minimal as I'm sure you can imagine.
The rule has been in place for at least the last 4 years.
Chill out!
de W5OV
> Hi !!
>
> Totally agree with K7QQ. For the last WPX, I have no plan to operate I
> was busy with work and sick. On Friday morning I finally decided to
> participate SOAB HP assisted, I get ready the station in Friday evening.
> Just 3 hours to slept 3 and start the contest.
>
> My claimed score it is on top5 at 3830. If I can't notify my
> participation few days before..... no chance to win ???
>
> Or if I decide to changes category at last minute for any problem or
> inconvenience or propagation.....no chance to win ???
>
> Best regards.
>
>
> Enviado desde mi iPhone
>
> El 02/06/2013, a las 20:34, "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net> escribió:
>
>> The proposal is STUPID
>>
>> Nr 1 I might change my mind at the last instant as to class I operate.
>> This last WPX I had planned to do SOLP single band, After a few
>> minutes of the excellent band condx I decide to go to high power and
>> all bands.
>>
>> I know that my score isn't going to be one of the BIG BIG ones but I
>> don't want to loose the 10 to 50 or so Q's that some OFFICAL CQ
>> inspector is going to cost me and to get in he has to climb over a
>> gate with barb wire on the top and walk 1/4 mile to the house. Or I
>> guess he could call and make an appointment .
>>
>> Rex K7QQ
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf
>> Of Albert Crespo
>> Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2013 1:15 PM
>> To: Martin Durham; cq-contest@contesting.com; k5zd@charter.net
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview Draft of 2013 CQ WW Contest Rules
>>
>> Good idea, but not reasonably possible to execute.
>> Is CQ going to set-up a cut off date that you need to notify them
>> of your operating intentions? If not, is someone from CQ with a
>> "stinking badge"
>> going to pound unannounced on someone's door and demand entrance any
>> time that is convenient to CQ to inspect what is going on?
>> What if someone had planned to do a two transmitter multi effort,
>> but it is learned that only three people can show up during the
>> contest weekend at different times,and you would rather do a
>> Multi-single,.
>> Would that change be allowed?
>> Or, if you had had planned to operate as SOAB HP and you amplifier
>> dies just before the contest, you are now precluded from operating as
>> SOAB low power?
>> This proposal does nothing to stomp out the gross cheaters that are
>> now prevalent in radio sport contesting.
>> Most of these clowns are not in areas that are easy to access and are
>> there exactly for that reason.
>> Is CQ going to send people to zones 9, 33 and 35 to monitor
>> operating?
>> CQ in the past few years has stepped up it's efforts to
>> investigate multiple signals and other dubious practices to insure
>> the cheaters do not have it so easy.
>> This proposal as written, will cause a lot of problems for the honest
>> operators and needs to be withdrawn as submitted.
>>
>> From: "Martin Durham" <w1md@cfl.rr.com>
>> To: k5zd@charter.net; "'Contest Reflector'"
>> <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
>> Sent: 02/06/2013 01:42:43
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Preview Draft of 2013 CQ WW Contest Rules
>>> Section VIII
>>>
>>> 14. A competitor who wishes to be judged for a top score in their
>>> category must agree to being visited at any time during the contest
>>> by an observer appointed by the CQ WW DX Contest Committee.
>>> Failure to respond to the Committee request or to allow a Committee
>>> appointed observer full access to the operating location during the
>>> contest period may result in the competitor being removed from award
>>> eligibility for 3 years.
>>>
>>> SO...will there now be a 'sign up' sheet on the CQWW site to sign
>>> 'advanced notice' of your operating intentions? This would be a
>>> requirement in order to be able to schedule a visit to the
>>> competitors site.
>>>
>>> And, is this for Single OP only or Mulit-OP as well?
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> W1MD
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On
>>> Behalf Of Randy Thompson K5ZD
>>> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:01 PM
>>> To: Contest Reflector
>>> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Preview Draft of 2013 CQ WW Contest Rules
>>>
>>> The CQ WW DX Contest Committee has conducted a complete review of
>>> the CQ WW Contest rules for 2013. We ask all contesters to read the
>>> new rules and let us know if you have questions or comments. We will
>>> use this feedback to improve the words or to add to the frequently
>>> asked questions on the web site.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> View a draft of proposed rules here. http://cqww.com/blog/?p=135
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The review period closes on June 25, 2013. The official rules for CQ
>>> WW DX Contest 2013 will be announced by July 2, 2013.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Looking forward to your feedback.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Randy Thompson, K5ZD
>>> Director - CQ WW DX Contest
>>>
>>> email: k5zd@cqww.com
>>> web: <http://www.cqww.com/> www.cqww.com
>>>
>>> Facebook: <http://www.facebook.com/cqwwdx> www.facebook.com/cqwwdx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> BlackBerry® 10
>> Find out more about the new BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
>> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/51ab9e47736981e4548aest04
>> duc _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|