CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Ed N1UR "competitive contester "

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Ed N1UR "competitive contester "
From: "Peter Voelpel" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 22:13:55 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Charles,
 
He can´t continue cqing while he is on a different band working Qs as only
one signal is allowed at the same time.
And concerning the break between calls, usually one stops the cq when he
hears a caller at the beginning not after that caller finished the call
completely.
 
73
Peter

  _____  

From: Charles Harpole [mailto:hs0zcw@gmail.com] 
Sent: Samstag, 1. Juni 2013 20:58
To: Peter Voelpel
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Ed N1UR "competitive contester "


Hello Peter, There is a big difference between one operator working one
frequency (regardless of his power level) and some aholes off on a different
band working Qs while having his other rig holding a freq with "empty CQs."
They are empty because, often, the stand-by time between calls is shorter
than my call sign and thus will not get an answer even it the op could
possibly be listening.  He is not listening;  he is holding a freq.  What,
other than having lots of radios, is to stop him from holding freqs on 5
bands while he works for real on one only?
 
73, Charly HS0ZCW


On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Peter Voelpel <dj7ww@t-online.de> wrote:


Sometimes it takes a lot of "empty CQing" when a station runs qrp or low
power with small antennas

73
Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Charles Harpole
Sent: Samstag, 1. Juni 2013 07:47
To: Edward Sawyer
Cc: CQ-Contest Reflector; rob
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Ed N1UR "competitive contester "

Yes, I am sick of "empty CQing" that is happening just to try to hold the
freq.  When will this begin to happen on several bands, maybe already"
73, Charly


On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Edward Sawyer <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>wrote:

> My point was not to go "prowling for CQing stations" without answers
> and jump on them.  I don't believe anyone is doing that.  Certainly
> not commonly from what I hear.
>
>
>
> My point was that if I start CQing on what I think is a clear
> frequency and you are close by.not too close for me, but closer than you
want me to be.
> And I get a fairly quick call or two to my CQs and start feeling
> "established".  Whether you have been CQing for a while or not.I am
> likely staying where I am if I am seeing rate.  And I will listen to
> the "objecting station" when challenged,  The last thing I want is to
> be covered over by his pile.  But if he is not too strong and not
> getting answers, and I am, I am likely staying.
>
>
>
> That is all I meant.
>
>
>
> The most important point is that a frequency is not a discrete point,
> its an implied bandwidth.  And some people get all worked up if you
> are within 400hz of their center frequency on CW.  And feel its
> "their" frequency.  I am using a rock solid 250hz bandwidth filter.
> That person is "non existent to me in most cases" when I am 250hz
> away.
>
>
>
> Ed  N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



--
Charly, HS0ZCW
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest





-- 
Charly, HS0ZCW 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>