CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-Assisted vs. Assisted

To: "Martin, LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-Assisted vs. Assisted
From: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:29:14 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Martin,

I wonder why you believe it is a mistake for assisted to be "penalized" 
relative to unassisted?  I would agree you would have a point if you also 
thought the WRTC competition should include assistance.  

The fact is that an operator with less ability will score closer to a better 
operator if both use assistance than if neither uses assistance.  Running 
stations on one radio, working new stations and new multipliers on another, and 
moving stations from one band to another takes a lot more skill than clicking 
on spots that are loaded by skimmer and knocking them off one after the other.  
As the activity is automated or includes the ability to point and shoot, the 
station's antenna performancat relative to pure operator talent becomes more 
and more important.  

The WRTC allows up to six qualifying entries (half) with full points in the MS 
category where the operator can use assistance and actually doesn't even have 
to make but one contact in a winning effort for it to count.  It should be 
relatively easy to get half the maximum number of points needed.  At some point 
in time, however, the successful qualifier has to prove him/herself as a by 
doing well without the assistance of skimmers and packet in a few contests. 

73...Stan, K5GO

Sent from my iPad


On Jan 31, 2013, at 5:41 AM, "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar> wrote:

> Big big mistake by WRTC committee.
> But well, they rule the game.
> There are creepy situations about this.
> Too sad.
> 
> 73.
> 
> Martin, LU5DX
> 
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 12:04 AM, <kenlow7@aol.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>>>> From: Hal Kennedy <halken@comcast.net>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Hal Kennedy wrote:>
>>>> Meanwhile, it is accepted that to date the best SO (A)
>>>> scores continue to besomewhat below the best SO scores.
>> 
>> Hal -
>> 
>> There's an easy 4-letter explanation for that:  W-R-T-C.
>> 
>> As long as the WRTC qualifying rules penalize Assisted entries, there's no
>> way the top guys will choose that category for their Single-Op efforts.
>> This has been the case ever since people recognized WRTC was a truer test
>> of operating ability since there is a referee present at all times.
>> 
>> In recent years, several excellent SO2R operators have already
>> demonstrated what happens when they enter Assisted in a major 48-hour
>> contest:  the multiplier count increases by 20% and they blow away the
>> Unassisted entries.
>> 
>> 73,
>> 
>> Ken KE3X
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>