Tom, I think maybe you misunderstood where I'm coming from.  Unlike Joe, 
W4TV, I believe that using Skimmer is just like using a cluster, only 
more powerful.  I have never argued for Skimmer use *not* putting 
someone in the assisted category.  I was simply trying to refute 
Charly's argument that it takes all the skill out of operating.
 One of the interesting things about CW Skimmer is that it is cumulative. 
For a single op, that means that you can mute the Skimmer SDR while 
you're transmitting, and it will pick up with spotting as soon as you 
stop.  I see this happen all the time here - Skimmer will spot a station 
or two as soon as I am not transmitting any longer.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
On 12/2/2012 10:29 AM, Tom W8JI wrote:
 Charly, the only thing that Skimmer replaces is the physical act of 
tuning the radio.
 
 For me, the objectionable part of skimmer is the removal or lessening 
of operator skill. I equate it to using a code reader. Local skimmer, 
used in single op, replaces the three acts of tuning the radio, 
copying the call, and entering the call in a data base. It gives the 
local station a form of automatic spotting system.
 The local technical requirements of isolating the receiver from the 
transmitter are significant on lower bands with high power, but it is 
possible to do. A conventional SDR here overloaded badly from the 
transmitter on 160 meters, but I'm sure that could have been cured. On 
80 meters and up a local SDR here can get into noise floor without 
local transmitter problems. The result would be a window filled with 
locally generated "spots" that require no operator assistance.
 I'm not saying this is good or bad, but it sure seems to be contrary 
to real single-op unassisted. With a low noise floor, a bandmap could 
fill with hundreds of useful locally generated spots. There isn't much 
difference between that and using a cluster.
73 Tom
 
 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
 
 |