To: | Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>, Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gafm.ee> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW |
From: | <aj9c@indy.rr.com> |
Date: | Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:41:36 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Beyond that are we now making a difference between the low bands and 20-10? ---- Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com> wrote: > Tõnno Vähk wrote: > > Working a Pacific or African station from EU on 80 or 160 meters during > > CQWW is often impossible without split because there are always stations > > calling on top of DX and no chance to make any Qs or one will take 10 > > minutes. > > This and other similar comments suggest we're debating the wrong issue. > > Is split operation the problem? Or is the problem the continuous callers -- > those who continue to call the DX even when he's come back to someone > else -- thus leading some operators to believe split operation is necessary? > > -- > > Doug Smith W9WI > Pleasant View, TN EM66 > _______________________________________________ > CQ-Contest mailing list > CQ-Contest@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW, Tom W8JI |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW, Dale Putnam |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW, Tom W8JI |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW, Dale Putnam |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |