CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW

To: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>, Tõnno Vähk <tonno.vahk@gafm.ee>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Split operation in CQ WW CW
From: <aj9c@indy.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:41:36 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Beyond that are we now making a difference between the low bands and 20-10?


---- Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com> wrote: 
> Tõnno Vähk wrote:
> > Working a Pacific or African station from EU on 80 or 160 meters during 
> > CQWW is often impossible without split because there are always stations
> > calling on top of DX and no chance to make any Qs or one will take 10 
> > minutes.
> 
> This and other similar comments suggest we're debating the wrong issue.
> 
> Is split operation the problem?  Or is the problem the continuous callers -- 
> those who continue to call the DX even when he's come back to someone 
> else -- thus leading some operators to believe split operation is necessary?
> 
> -- 
> 
> Doug Smith W9WI
> Pleasant View, TN  EM66
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>