CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network News - hopefully of generalinter

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network News - hopefully of generalinterest
From: Bill Feidt <bill@ng3k.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 08:16:55 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 08/13/2012 08:56 PM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:

> I believe that Win-Test already has this option, but I wonder why it is
> necessary.  I have gotten very used to the sequence of
> Click/listen/tweak/call.  The tweak is almost often ~200 Hz.  The time
> lost is trivial.

Pete, no doubt it's easy enough for the calling operator to implement 
the tweak on the fly.  But, the benefit for having it occur 
automatically would be to the CQing station who would be less likely to 
have multiple stations calling him all at once, zero-beat his frequency. 
  Operators who omit the "tweak" step cause the problem for the CQer and 
an automatic random offset would be step toward eliminating such skimmer 
pileups.

73,

Bill/NG3K

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>