CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP
From: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:51:49 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
They are. As is UN Headquarters.

It's silly that a building in Manhattan is a multiplier but the District 
of Columbia is not. The fact is that the District of Columbia is the 
only separate top-level political subdivision within the United States 
or Canada that is not a multiplier in NAQP.

73,

Paul, N8HM

On 8/11/2012 10:16 AM, Aldewey@aol.com wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong but PR and VI ARE multipliers in NAQP.  Right?
> What am I missing?
>   
> 73,
>   
> Al, K0AD
>   
>   
> In a message dated 8/11/2012 8:36:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> wn3vaw@verizon.net writes:
>
> Otherwise, one could make a case for PR & VI, as populated US  territories
> within the generally accepted bounds of North America, should  also be
> mults.
> Is that what you want?  Or would that be an  unanticipated  consequence?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>