CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: [N1MM] New RAC (ARRL contest) sections

To: "Joe" <nss@mwt.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: [N1MM] New RAC (ARRL contest) sections
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:12:48 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
All things being equal (and they never are, of course), scores in SS will 
rise by a factor of .0375.

Yawwwnnnn!  I have bigger things to worry about.

But if we need to have controversy, this one beats arguing about length of 
microphone cords.

73, de Hans, K0HB


-----Original Message----- 
From: Joe
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 1:59 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Fwd: [N1MM] New RAC (ARRL contest) sections

Kinda screws up the scoring now too,  three new mults can change a score
by a LOT!

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 8/8/2012 6:59 PM, Paul Hudson wrote:
>
>
> Paul
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Paul Hudson <va3cwa@gmail.com>
>> Date: 8 August, 2012 7:56:46 PM EDT
>> To: "n2ic@arrl.net" <n2ic@arrl.net>
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [N1MM] New RAC (ARRL contest) sections
>>
>> Yes that's correct Steve. The RAC people are ignorant about contesting 
>> and this stupid decision to spit ON into 4 sections is based only on ARES 
>> matters. The ARRL in my opinion is not wise in adopting the new Section 
>> Splits and I spoke with NN1N And Dave Sumner at Dayton and they both blew 
>> me off when I tried to get them to ignore the new sections. Sad
>>
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> On 2012-08-08, at 12:39 PM, Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So, let me get this straight....
>>>
>>> RAC splits Ontario into 4 sections, but won't use those sections in RAC 
>>> contests.
>>>
>>> ARRL (which is independent from RAC) does use those new sections in ARRL 
>>> contests.
>>>
>>> Sorry, but I continue to believe that this is a poor decision by the 
>>> ARRL. Maybe
>>> it should be reconsidered by the ARRL Board of Directors at their 
>>> January meeting.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Steve, N2IC
>>>
>>> On 08/08/2012 09:45 AM, Tom Haavisto wrote:
>>>> No
>>>>
>>>> They will only appear in contests that use ARRL sections.  RAC Canada 
>>>> Day
>>>> and Winter contests use provinces as mults.
>>>>
>>>> Tom - VE3CX
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Ted Edwards 
>>>> W3TB<w3tb.ted@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> **
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> May I also assume that these sections are also used in Canadian 
>>>>> contests
>>>>> such as the Canada Day events in December and July 1st?
>>>>>
>>>>> I had anticipated -- incorrectly -- that they would appear at Field 
>>>>> Day and
>>>>> trained our new operators to watch for them.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> 73 de Ted Edwards, W3TB and GØPWW
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>