A more pointed question should be asked of the IARU and ARRL - why do
some contests continue to ignore the existence of Single-Op-Assisted as
a valid category, and (with a pejorative connotation) "reclassify" them
as multi-single?
The IARU ban on decoders refers only to multi-channel decoders. I think
4.1.3 is pretty clear - don't use the RBN unless you wish to become
multi-single. RBN spots are distributed by the same Telnet means
employed by the traditional DX Clusters, and in fact are increasingly
being offered as an option on those clusters. Thanks to VE7CC and AB5K
for enhancing their cluster software to allow the Skimmer/RBN option.
73, Pete N4ZR
The World Contest Station Database, at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at
reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000 and
arcluster.reversebeacon.net, port 7000
On 7/10/2012 3:55 AM, Jukka Klemola wrote:
> Regarding RBN, I thought there is a no-statement on internet.
>
> Anyway, for a single op, decoding assistance is not allowed.
>
> That may be human or technical of origin .. the idea is the operator
> does all signal finding, decoding and interpreting alone .. as a
> single operator.
>
>
> 73,
> Jukka OH6LI
>
>
> 2012/7/10 brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk>:
>> Here is the rule dealing with 'Assistance'.....
>>
>> ..... 4.1.3. Use of spotting nets, packet, or multi-channel decoders
>> (such as CW Skimmer) is not permitted. Single-operator stations that use
>> spotting nets, packet or multi-channel decoders will be reclassified to the
>> Multi-operator, Single Transmitter category.
>>
>> For the sake of clarity, as 'RBN' is not specihically mentioned, can it be
>> confirmed that use of RBN is assistance and that it's use places ops in the
>> Multi op category,
>>
>> Rule 6.4 does mention use of the internet.....
>>
>> 6.4. The use of non-amateur radio means of communications (e.g.
>> telephone or the Internet) for the purpose of soliciting a contact (or
>> contacts) during the contest period is inconsistent with the spirit and
>> intent of these rules.
>>
>> It does seem to me though that because Skimmer is mentioned many guys take
>> the view that if an 'aid' is not mentioned as excluded then it is ok.
>>
>> 73 Brian 5B4AIZ /C4Z.
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|