Hi Phillip
Wich contest are you talking about?
I don´t agree with that. I don´t like to participate in contest with this
kind of rule. And if not specify in the rules is worst
This is why I don´t participate in contests that assume that you are lying
and adding QSO´s in the log
73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W
-----Mensaje original-----
De: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] En nombre de Phillip Conza
Enviado el: lunes, 25 de junio de 2012 01:48
Para: cq-contest@contesting.com
Asunto: [CQ-Contest] your opinion pse
Gentlemen,
Your opinions or ideas etc on this please.
A local contester had a contact removed because of :
.Last year an OP worked a LU station but it was disallowed because he was
the only one who worked him, and 4 others had to work it before it was
allowed as a multiplier. Nothing in the rules about that - apparently it's
accepted international practice.
I am not on a witch hunt I have read the rules covering this contest and I
have read the ARRL DX rules which I take qualify as a body who would use "
accepted international practice " yet I can't find any reference to this
..Is there such or is this pie in the sky ?
Please gentleman your input.. or a pointer to this " accepted international
practice "
Just don't want to see it happen again ..
73 Phillip
ZL2TZE / ZL2U
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|