If I can operate from my comfy chair, why would I consider going to that 100
degree shack?
The technology for remote operation is approaching zero cost, other than the
cost of an internet connection, and the savings of air fare/excess baggage
pretty much covers that.
Why is the location of the OPERATOR important, so long as the radio station
location complies with the contest rules (500M circle, and all that)?
Is there some elevated worthiness that comes from suffering from heat rash
and distended bladders?
73, de Hans, K0HB
-----Original Message-----
From: Albert Crespo
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 3:45 PM
To: K0HB
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Magazine Award Policy for Remote Base
Operations
Hans,
Try operating in a 100 degree shack for 48 hours, no toilet nearby, etc.,-
is that as comfy as you chair?
-----Original Message-----
From: K0HB
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 2:22 PM
To: Albert Crespo
Cc: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Magazine Award Policy for Remote Base
Operations
Al,
I'm in my living room in a comfy leather chair writing to you from my iPad.
Much more comfortable than the office-style chair in my shack, and K0CKB
kindly refills my coffee mug from time to time.
>From this same seat using this same iPad I can launch a free iPad app
>(google "CommCat Mobile") to operate my station remotely. If a new country
>comes on the air, will I get DXCC credit if I work him from here, or must I
>leave this comfy chair and work him from my stiff office chair in the
>shack?
Do I get more contest karma if I make my operating conditions less
comfortable?
73, de Hans, K0HB
On Jun 21, 2012, at 4:10 AM, "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr> wrote:
> Is there the perception that operating from a doggy place where if you
> forget to use bottle water to brush your teeth can cause disease is
> equivalent to operating from the comforts of your own home?
> Fatigue is a big factor in a 48 hour contest and having a remote setup
> is
> a clear advantage over someone who is not doing so.
> There are no travel or jet lag issues when operating from home. The list
> goes on and on on the side of being at the site.
> If people want to use remote, fine, but let's not kind anybody that is the
> same as being at the site.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: W0MU Mike Fatchett
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2012 4:07 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Magazine Award Policy for Remote Base
> Operations
>
> I agree Ken.
>
> If I want to spend the money to build a remote station in J6 or HK or
> wherever and it is legal it should be allowed. Where the operator sits
> is of little consequence. The contacts are made with a STATION in J6
> or HK.
>
> Mike W0MU
>
> W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net
>
> On 6/20/2012 5:36 PM, Ken Widelitz wrote:
>> CQ Magazine, June, 2012, Page 91:
>>
>> "Contacts with a remote base station are valid for all CQ contest and
>> award
>> purposes. Award applications by a remote base operator are permitted only
>> if
>> both the station (transmitters, receivers, and antennas) and the operator
>> are located in the same country (entity)."
>>
>> Are "contest" awards (certificates, plaques, trophies) "by a remote base
>> operator" covered by the second sentence? Since the first sentence
>> indicates
>> it covers contest contacts, it is implied that the second sentence does
>> also. Personally, I couldn't care less about CQ Magazine non-contest
>> awards,
>> but I do care about contest awards.
>>
>> If this policy applies to contests, it is a terrible policy. Policies
>> should
>> be implemented in order to have MORE entities to work in contests, not
>> less
>> (i.e., my understanding is that the 2 point NA QSO rule was implemented
>> to
>> encourage Dxpeditions to NA entities.) Also, it would be another rule
>> where
>> it is almost impossible to detect a violation.
>>
>> What difference does it make where the operator is located when operating
>> a
>> remote station? In every case, the operator simply is not at the station
>> where transmitters, receivers, and antennas are located.
>>
>> 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT (not yet remotable, but most probably will be in
>> the
>> future)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
73, de Hans, K0HB
--
"Just a boy and his radio"
--
Proud Member of:
A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
Minnesota Wireless contesters - http://www.W0AA.org
Arizona Outlaws contesters - http://www.arizonaoutlaws.net
Twin City DX Assn - http://www.tcdxa.org
Lake Vermilion DX Assn - http://www.lvdxa.org
CWOps - http://www.cwops.org
SOC - http://www.qsl.net/soc
Twin City FM Club - http://tcfmc.org
--
Superstition trails --> http://oldslowhans.wordpress.com/
Sea stories here ---> http://k0hb.wordpress.com/
Request QSL at ---> http://www.clublog.org/logsearch/K0HB
All valid QSL requests honored with old fashioned paper QSL!
LoTW participant
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|