CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit

To: "'Glenn Wyant'" <va3dx@sympatico.ca>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit
From: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 15:53:32 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
And what about all the stations that logged the signal report less contact
with me?  Are they going to loose points ... I don't think so.  That rule is
obviously not applied.  So why are so many hell bent to keep sending that
mindless fictitious signal report?  One of the mysteries of life I guess.

Doug

>-----Original Message-----

>I wonder if you sent in a log ?
>
>After all the rules state  a signal report is part of the exchange ...
>
>Glenn VA3DX
>
>Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 9:18 AM
>Subject: [CQ-Contest] dit dit dit
>
>
>>I was waiting for someone to take this to it's logical conclusion.  But it
>> isn't happening.  Why send the signal report at all?  The logging
programs
>> already default to 59/599.  At the minimal since cut signal numbers are
>> accepted and someone really insists on sending some fictitious signal
>> report
>> then send an E or T only.  I am all in favor of not sending a signal
>> report
>> at all.  I sent no signal report during the CQWWSSB test and no one asked
>> me
>> for a signal report.  Wake up.
>>
>> Doug

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>