It has been an eye opening experience from J6. We have been hounded
with most all of the the previous people have spoken about. Apparently
599 8 now means TU or should I say enn 8. I guess we don't need to copy
anything but callsigns now.
This is very bad on RTTY where big stations attempt to brute force
contacts by effectively jamming the station that was called.
I would agree that the USA stations are getting much worse where K2
means everyone but the K2 gets to call.
Don't even get me started on the behavior of a great many stations
across the big pond. The list of abusers is enormous.
I was last in KP2 land in the 90's and the operating practices have
changed dramatically and for the worse.
For the record other than a very brief time we signed our call after
every qso in the contest. I tried limiting the use of our call for
pileup management but it really did not matter. I even tried split on
the high end of 10m and it really doesn't work.
I am not sure why the European stations are not using the reverse
beacons. When we were not spotted in EU by a real person the pileups
were ok. As soon as a spot from an EU hit the cluster it was instant
bedlam and a pileup that was completely unworkable due to the endless
calling. We moved numerous times when this happened. Maybe super cw
ops can deal with these huge pileups better but for an average guy it is
pretty crazy!
Thanks for all the contacts in the test.
Mike W0MU
J6M CQ WW DX CW Contest 2011
J6/W0MU November 21 - December 1 2011
W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net
On 11/28/2011 4:49 PM, kr2q@optimum.net wrote:
> The following is my opinion and should not be construed as anything official
> from any
> contest sponsor with which I may be associated.
>
> "Dumping it in" has indeed gotten worse. What I find "upsetting" is that
> folks are still doing
> this, even more of this, in light of the current initiative for FAIR PLAY
> (CQWW). Clearly,
> mistakes happen. But if the same stations are doing this all the time, then
> that is a clear
> violation of FAIR PLAY. That is easily defined as UNSPORTSMAN LIKE behavior;
> an actionable
> offense in the CQWW.
>
> If anyone has recordings or has taken note of such behavior, I would URGE
> them to go ahead
> and contact the offending station, post it on CQ-Contest, or do SOMETHING to
> point out
> that this is not FAIR PLAY. A "hall of shame," while not exactly what I
> would have in mind, isn't
> bad either...at least it's a start.
>
> Being a QRP contester, I get dumped on all the time. I take it for granted.
> When the DX
> comes back "KR2," that seems to be an alert to the other callers that, "Hey,
> I can dump
> on him easy." That's OK and I don't really take it personally. But yes,
> this very bad modus
> operandi should not be condoned or tolerated IF it can be shown that this is
> more than just
> an honest mistake (hint: have your ducks in a row and documentation in place
> if you plan
> to confront or cite anyone). I say, LET THEM KNOW YOU ARE PISSED OFF.
> Forget the
> "gentlemen" stuff...make a stink about it. To do otherwise is tacit approval
> of such lousy
> behavior.
>
> So with FAIR PLAY in mind, I say it's time to bring some daylight to the
> offenders. Do the
> right thing.
>
> de Doug KR2Q
>
> REMINDER:
> The preceding is my opinion and should not be construed as anything official
> from any
> contest sponsor with which I may be associated.
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|