Hi Doug,
Any chance you have historical data on this? Might be interesting to see if
there is a trend. Are operators operating less of the contest now than they
were, say, ten years ago? Twenty?
Just a shot in the dark!
--
Mike DeChristopher, N1TA
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:07 PM, <kr2q@optimum.net> wrote:
> It is great to see interest in creating more entrants in the CQWW
> contests...
> THANKS for the input!
>
> Just as an FYI, here is some data for 2011 SSB (so far). These are
> e-logs, which means that paper
> logs are not yet included in the analysis below. I did this in Excel, so
> I hope the columns come out
> reasonably close to being legible reformatting to this "typewriter" format
> (OK, DOS or character-based format).
>
> duration Pct of all logs Count
> ? 0.9% 63
> < 1 hr 6.1% 430
> 1 - 9.9 hours 47.5% 3357
> 10 - 23.9 hours 32.1% 2270
> 24 - 35.9 hours 7.5% 533
> 36 - 39.9 hours 2.0% 138
> 40 - 43.9 hours 1.5% 108
> 44+ hours 2.3% 164
>
> So out of these 7000+ logs, so far, 1663 will qualify for an award. Not
> "be eligible," but actually get
> an award. Pretty good odds and clearly far beyond the "boundaries" of
> "operate at least 24 hours!"
> In fact 1163 of the 1663 will go to entrants with less than 24 hours (yes,
> that includes all categories
> of entry).
>
> Hope you find this informative, if not interesting.
>
> de Doug KR2Q
> PS There is nothing "special" about these categories, I just made them up.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|