This definition of skimmer and assisted is about the most concise I've seen
in quite a while. It covers the issues of band scopes, decoding signals,
skimmers covering an entire swath of spectrum, etc. (at least as far as SSB
and CW contests are concerned).
I think it also works to avoid alienation of new contesters and
inexperienced ones that feel the need to use a CW decoder when they are
S&Ping by labelling these items as purely assistive devices and relegating a
casual op into the dreaded "(A)" class.
Please formalize this and ensure that the various contest sponsors include
it in their definitions....
73 Rich NN3W
----- Original Message -----
From: <w5ov@w5ov.com>
To: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Joe'" <nss@mwt.net>; "Bob Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>;
<cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was:
=>RE:Chea
> Actually, it is.
>
> You have to have both locating AND identifying components performed by the
> operator.
>
> Of course, with digital modes, a decoder (a machine of some sort) is
> required as very few operators can decode RTTY or PSK (as just two
> examples) just with their ears.
>
> I think that for digital signals, if you are single op - without
> assistance, that the decoder should be single-channel (decoding just one
> signal at a time) and require that the operator select (tune in) a signal
> to begin the decoding process.
>
> IMO, a device like skimmer for CW (or something similar that does Digital
> modes), that simultaneously decodes all signals within a passband is
> clearly different and its use should be considered assisted operating for
> those modes as well.
>
> 73,
>
> Bob W5OV
>
>
>> Bob,
>> Your explanation is not universal.
>> What about RTTY or PSK contests where "machine identifies every
>> callsign"?
>>
>> 73, Igor UA9CDC
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bob Naumann" <W5OV@W5OV.COM>
>> To: "'Joe'" <nss@mwt.net>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2011 6:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was:
>> =>RE:Chea
>>
>>
>>> Joe,
>>>
>>> You've lost the focus on what single operator means.
>>>
>>> It means that one operator *locates AND identifies* every callsign that
>>> he
>>> puts in his log.
>>>
>>> No machine does it for him (local or remote makes no difference), nor
>>> any
>>> other person.
>>>
>>> When you focus on what single op means, it becomes very easy to see what
>>> should be considered as assisted.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>>
>>> Bob W5OV
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
>>> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe
>>> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 10:41 AM
>>> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was:
>>> =>RE:
>>> Chea
>>>
>>> I never understand why this is always soo hard.
>>>
>>> Assisted,
>>> Another person or machine OUTSIDE your station helped you make or find
>>> contacts.
>>>
>>> Machine INSIDE your station is just that station equipment Not assisted.
>>>
>>> Person INSIDE your station helps you is also not called Assisted, but
>>> it IS called MULTIOP
>>>
>>> Joe WB9SBD
>>>
>>> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
>>> Idle Tyme
>>> Idle-Tyme.com
>>> http://www.idle-tyme.com
>>>
>>> On 9/26/2011 4:54 AM, Marijan Miletic, S56A wrote:
>>>> EI5DI wrote: To this I say that anyone who needs a CW decoder has no
>>>> business being in a CW contest - because they don't know CW.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know Baudot code so I used PC decoder this fabulous CQ WW RTTY
>>>> weekend. I built DH1TW type SDR IF adapter in my FT-1000MP in order to
>>>> "see" 20 kHz bandwidth. I also wrote my own program to decode all RTTY
>>>> callsigns within BUT if I use it, I am "assisted". By whom?
>>>>
>>>> I feel digitally "restricted" without Extreme class :-( This is NOT
>>>> good
>>>> for the best scientific hobby of 21st century as advertised by IARU.
>>>>
>>>> 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|