CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Cheating

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Cheating and bad journalism
From: JVarney <jvarn359@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Collins, Graham <CollinG@navcanada.ca> wrote:

"Seems to me that ASSISTED or NOT-ASSISTED is splitting hairs - some choose to 
use a tool and others not, much the same as some choose to log on a computer 
and others on paper. Perhaps there needs to be categories for "COMPUTER LOGGED" 
and another for "PAPER LOGGED"; after all, those that choose to log on a 
computer have an unfair advantage over those that choose to log on paper."


I agree. An example of hair splitting centers around the use of panadapters and 
bandscopes. If you have a panadapter showing 180 kHz of spectrum in real time 
without Skimmer, it's deemed Unassisted. If Skimmer is turned on, it's 
Assisted. Regardless of what the rules say, I personally think a panadapter 
(with or without Skimmer) is a technological assist to the operator and 
provides quite an advantage over manual tuning. Seeing a new signal and 
clicking on it is a lot faster and easier than turning a VFO dial blind.

Maybe what could be done is to have two categories: Single Operator, where all 
tools such as Skimmer, clusters, panadapters, etc. are permitted; and Single 
Operator Traditional Radio, where manual VFO tuning is required and human, 
visual band display, internet, and packet assistance are all prohibited.

73 Jim K6OK
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>