I agree with Ed,
RDXC is good example for new contest.
BTW my posts are being rejected by list and I can not see why, if this
one goes to trash by moderators then I get the message.
73 Danny
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:05:42 -0400, Edward Sawyer wrote:
> I agree with part of W5OV's statement. If they agreed to secrecy,
> they
> should be tied to it. However, if the group does disband and get
> re-built,
> it's the perfect time to change it to transparent. Personally, I
> believe it
> should be transparent. This isn't the United Nations Security
> Council
> folks.its contesting.
>
>
>
> If rules of a very popular contest are being proposed to be changed,
> the
> voice of the ones enjoying it every year are pretty important voices
> and
> deserve to be heard.
>
>
>
> By the way, let me be the first to vote NO on changes to the ARRL DX
> contest
> as we know it and YES to starting up a new contest that is conceived
> by the
> collective wisdom of this group. One more series of DX contests
> would have
> my vote. And if it wants to be distance based, work everybody, only
> be 24
> hours, (pick your favorite topic here), go for it. I vote for April.
>
>
>
> 73
>
>
>
> Ed N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|