CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Chea

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Cheating and bad journalism
From: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@citlink.net>
Reply-to: k0rc@citlink.net
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:52:51 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I don't think  you will find what you are looking for because this 
statement:

*XII

5. By submitting a CQ WW RTTY Contest log, and entrant agrees that the 
issuing of red cards, yellow cards, and other decisions of the CQ WW CC 
are official and final.*

pretty much wraps it up. They decide and it's final. No explanation to 
the participants is necessary. This is pretty much the position of most 
contest sponsors.

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
------------------------------------------------------------------------


On 9/22/2011 10:16 AM, Collins, Graham wrote:
> I am sure this topic has been discussed before (ad nauseam) and there must be 
> some documentation of some sort by Contest organizers that state their 
> position and methodology in making such determinations but I have been 
> unsuccessful in finding same. Does anyone have any pointers to such documents 
> or discussions?
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>