The ARRL is hardly a sterling example of forthright and courageous
adjudication. They are quite possibly the most conflict averse amateur
radio organization on this planet, a good example being how they
recently handled the controversy over HQ stations in the IARU contest.
If they were a political entity the ostrich would be on their official
crest. Please please please don't pattern your behavior after that of
the ARRL.
73,
Dave AB7E
On 8/21/2011 2:31 PM, Francisco Costa, CT1EAT wrote:
> Hi Randy
>
>> The best way to help is to report your suspicions, or
>> better, to provide evidence. These "suspicions" are
>> very helpful to the sponsor in knowing where to look
>> for more information.
> I respectfull desagree.
> Some years ago I had the hard decision to complain
> about another CT station (due a violation of national
> issuing special calls rules).
> For the fisrt time I made a complain to a contest sponsor.
> I couldn't belive when I read the reply. They simply
> said that was an internal CT issue, and they couldn't
> care less. That was my 1st, only and last complain.
> In case you are wondering, the contest sponsor was ARRL.
>
> 73 F.Costa, CT1EAT
> http://ct1eat.no.sapo.pt
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|