What this debate highlights is the anomoly of creating only one listing for the
QRP section, whereas every other section is divided, NA & Rest of the World.
Because of the different scoring systems, viz NA/ROW,what is being done here is
comparing apples with pears, ie it is meaningless, and it just so happens in
this case that the resultant scores of these two stns finish up pretty close
and, accordingly, both operators should rightly receive trophies and maybe this
was the rationale behind the CC's decision to award two trophies.
73 Brian 5B4AIZ/C4Z.
From: Rob Van Geen <rvangeen@gmail.com>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Sent: Friday, 5 August 2011, 1:15
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] KR2Q - RX1CQ
Yes. It is certainly possible to achieve a "Golden Log", especially when
you operate >99% S&P.
Check out the logs for yourself!
http://www.cqww.com/cq-ww-ssb-2010.htm
Very impressive operating by the two of them! They deserve the trophies
that they each had won (#1 World & #1 Europe).
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com> wrote:
> Amazing "performance" by the guys checking the logs of the QRP-section of
> the contest I would say.
>
> I have seen many dubious results in QRP during the years, but the CQWW 2010
> results must compete in a very unique category.
>
> Anything else than publishing of the two UBN-logs would be a big
> dissapointment.
>
> Please observe that I do not take any side in this debate. The winner could
> definitely be the legitimate winner, BUT noone, and I mean noone, can
> manage
> to keep the claimed scores unchanged...
>
> If the CQWW CC lacks interest, skills or guts to fairly judge the
> QRP-section, then better remove this category at all!
>
> The efforts made by QRP-contesters are by no means less impressive than HP-
> and LP-entries. These guys need the same kind of attention and detailed
> checking as anyone else. A lot of things is going in behind the curtains in
> QRP-contesting - therefore careful and EQUAL treatment of all top-scoring
> stations should be compulsory.
>
> 73 and 72 / RA/SM6LRR, Mats
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|